Patent Infringement and Remedies of Patent Registration in Coimbatore

Get a Quote

Patent Infringement in India

Patent Registration is a techno-legal document of the invention. It is a provide of exclusive rights to the owner, to exclude others from making, presenting for sale, selling or uploading patented invention. Infringement is the unauthorized use of individual’s invention claimed in a valid patent. Patent infringement is an unauthorized or unrecognized use of selling, manufacturing, imparting to sell, uploading or using in-force patented invention with out the permission of a patented owner.


Patent infringement complaints can only be initiated after provide of patent in India but may encompass a claim retrospectively from the date of publication of the application for grant of the patent. Infringement of a patent consists of the unauthorized making, uploading, the use of, imparting for sale or selling any patented invention inside India. Under the (Indian) Patents Act, 1970 handiest a civil action may be initiated in a Court of Law.

Sections 104 to 114 of the Indian Patents Act 1970 provide guidelines regarding patent infringement.

According to Section 53, the validity of a patent is 20 Years from the date of filing a patent application for Patent Registration in India.


Indian Limitations act governs the duration of limitation for bringing a match for infringement of a patent, that’s for 3 years from the date of infringement.

If the patent has ceased to have an effect because of non-fee of renewal fee, then the patentee will no longer be entitled to institute the lawsuits for infringement devoted between the date on which the patent ceased to have an impact and date of e-book of the application for recovery of patent registration.


A Patent holder can report a fit in a district court or High court. However wherein counter-claims for revocation of the patent is made by means of the defendant, the in shape along side counter-claims are transferred to the excessive court for a selection on validity of a patent.

According to Section 19 of the Civil Procedure Code, the patentee can convey the suit for infringement in the courtroom which has jurisdiction in region in which he/she resides or contains on a business or for my part works for the gain. The Patentee can also bring the healthy for infringement in a court docket which has jurisdiction in the area wherein infringing interest took place.

A healthy for patent infringement can be instituted most effective after the patent has been sealed. But damages sustained in respect of infringement committed for the duration of the duration among the date of advertisement of reputation of complete specification and the date of sealing can be claimed within the fit.

The proper to sue for infringement belongs to the patentee. An assignee is entitled to document a in shape if the application for patent registration of the project has been filed earlier than the date of filing of match. A co-proprietor may additionally convey a match for infringement.

In India most effective High Courts have the energy to copy with depend of each infringement and invalidity simultaneously. A specialized forum is now been established because the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB).The Patents (Amendment) Act 2002 was enacted to deliver our patent regime in step with the TRIPS agreement. The IPAB became conferred through this Act with the jurisdiction to hear all cases against any order or choice of the controller and all cases touching on revocation of patent registration aside from on a counter declare in a in shape for infringement and rectification of registers and all such instances which had been pending earlier than the High Court’s stood transferred to the IPAB by Section 117-G of this Act.

The IPAB has its headquarters at Chennai. The Registry is situated at Chennai, in which sittings also are held. Circuit sittings are held at gift at Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata and Ahmedabad.

Rights of Patentees


Section 48 confers special rights upon the patentee to exclude 0.33 parties from making, importing, using, providing for sale or promoting the patented system. The right a patentee acquires is a monopoly to him personally to fabricate the patented chattel. Without the Patent Act

As in keeping with provisions of Section 48: the subsequent actions would quantity to infringement –

In case of a product patent, the following movements would quantity to infringement:

• Making,

• Using

• Offering for sale,

• Selling, or

• Importing for those purposes, the product in India without the permission of patentee.

In case of a manner patent, the following movements would quantity to infringement:

• Using,

• Offering for sale,

• Selling, or

• Importing for these purposes, the technique in India without the permission of patentee.

Any character who without the consent of patentee plays the above infringes the patent.

In patent infringement suits, the damages are not granted for the use of the patented invention at some stage in the period previous to the date of acceptance of the patent application.

In a patent infringement action, the defendant can file a counterclaim for a revocation of the patent registration. Consequently, the main match and the counterclaim are heard together.

Relief in case of groundless threats

Section 106 of the Indian Patents Act 1970 grants electricity to the courtroom to furnish remedy in case of groundless threats of infringement proceedings.

In such an action the plaintiff can pray for a declaration to the effect that the threats are unjustified; he can ask for an injunction towards the continuance of the threats and additionally damages if any, he may additionally have sustained thereby.

In such a healthy, until the defendant proves that there is, in reality a threat of infringement of his patent registration or any other right springing up from the publication of the complete specification in respect of the patent the courtroom might not supply comfort to the plaintiff.

Under the commonplace law, the main remedy to be had against such unfair acts is via action for the tort of change libel.

Trade libel is defined because the guide of a fake declaration of fact this is an intentional disparagement of the great of the services or products of the plaintiff’s business and that result in pecuniary damages to the plaintiff.

Remedies available to Patentee for infringement

Section 108 (1) of the Patents Act, 1970 provides for the Reliefs in match for infringement. It states that – “The reliefs which a court may grant of patent registration in any fit for patent infringement includes an injunction (problem to such terms, if any, as the court thinks fit) and, at the choice of the plaintiff, both damages or an account of profits.”

The reliefs that are to be had to a patentee in in shape for patent infringement in opposition to an infringer are:-

• Permanent injunction;

• Temporary / Interlocutory injunction;

• Ex-parte injunction;

• Damages or an account of profits;

• Seizure, forfeiture or destruction of infringing products / goods and / or substances and implements predominantly used in the advent of the infringing products / goods

Temporary Injunction/Interlocutory Injunction

For furnish of temporary injunction in a fit for infringement, the courtroom should don’t forget that-

1. There is a prima facie case that the patent infringement is legitimate and infringed;

2. The balance of convenience is in favour of injunction being granted;

3. The plaintiff will go through irreparable loss.

It is a rule of practice that if a patent registration is new one, an meantime injunction will with ease be granted. If the patent is adequately old and has been worked, the courtroom may properly presume the patent to be legitimate and supply injunction.

Permanent Injunctions

Permanent Injunctions are granted publish trial of the patent infringement suit. Once the meantime injunction is issued, the lawsuit maintains as normal. If the plaintiff wins at the trial, the preliminary injunction usually becomes permanent. If the defendant wins, the preliminary injunction is dissolved, and the defendant can searching for recovery in opposition to the bond as discussed.

The US Supreme Court in eBay, Inc. V. MercExchange L.L.C. Has set a four-factor take a look at which a plaintiff have to demonstrate as a way to searching for a permanent injunctive remedy from the court docket.

‘A plaintiff have to demonstrate –

• That it has suffered an irreparable injury,

• That remedies available at law, such as economic damages, are inadequate to atone for that injury,

• That, considering the balance of hardships between the plaintiff and defendant, a remedy in fairness is warranted,

• That the public interest would now not be disserved by way of a everlasting injunction,

Canadian and English courts no longer most effective have the energy and discretion to supply an injunction but additionally to require infringers to “deliver up” and ruin any goods with regards to the infringing innovation.

Even below the USA Patent Code, the patentee shall have a treatment by way of civil movement for infringement of his motion. According to Section 283, ‘The numerous courts having jurisdiction of cases underneath this identify may supply injunctions in accordance with the ideas of equity to prevent the violation of any proper secured by using patent, on such terms as the court docket deems reasonable’.


Once the healthy is determined in favour of the plaintiff, the Court can either award damages or direct the defendant to render an account of earnings. The treatments are opportunity and not concurrent in nature.

In a in shape for infringement of patent, damages shall now not be granted in opposition to the defendant who proves that at the date of infringement he was unaware and had no affordable grounds for believing that the patent registration existed or wherein an modification of a specification were allowed after the booklet of the specification, and the infringement motion is in admire of the specification before the date of publication unless the Court is satisfied unique specification turned into made in god faith and with affordable talent and knowledge.

There are recognized form of compensable damages for patent infringement-

1) Lost Profits

Lost income damages may be measured primarily based upon the causation elements set forth in Panduit Corp. V. Stahlin Bros. Fibre Works, Inc.

Under the Panduit test, the patentee have to prove four elements to establish lost earnings. The 4 elements are:

(1) A name for for the goods protected by the patent;

(2) An absence of suited non-infringing substitutes to the patented product or process;

(3) The manufacturing and marketing skills to exploit the demand; and

(4) The amount of profit the patentee could have made had the infringement no longer occurred.

2) Reasonable Royalty

When real damages cannot be proved, or are not sought for reasons of proof, trial method or otherwise, the patent owner is entitled to not much less than a reasonable royalty as damages. The purpose of the royalty alternative is not to direct the shape of compensation, however to set a floor underneath which harm awards might not fall.

Reasonable royalty was defined in Panduit Corp. V. Stahlin Bros. An quantity which a person desiring to fabricate and promote a patented article, as a business proposition, would be inclined to pay as a patent royalty and yet be capable of make and promote the patented article inside the marketplace at an inexpensive profit.

This can be illustrated from the Ericsson v. Micromax judgment where the Delhi High Court directed the respondents to pay intervening time royalty to the plaintiff.

Defenses to be had in a Patent Infringement Suit

Patent infringement and gavel. Copyright law concept.

The defendant in a match for infringement of a patent may lead one or greater of the subsequent defenses:

1. Plaintiff no longer entitled to sue for infringement,

2. Denial of infringement or of any danger or intention to infringe,,

3. leave or license specific or implied to use the invention,

4. Estoppels or res judicata,

5. The acts complied are in accordance with the situations laid out in section 47(Government use, experiment, studies and education),

6. Claims presupposed to be infringed are invalid on sure grounds( Revocation of Patents)

7. For Patent in recognize of Medicine or drug, for its own use of Govt. Of India, for distribution in Govt. Dispensary and hospitals or with the aid of gazette notifications to other dispensaries, hospitals and scientific institutions.

8. Alleged infringement now not novel or is obvious (Lord Moulton’s defense or Gillete defense).

What does now not constitute Infringement?

Section 107A in the act includes bolar provision and provision for parallel imports. Section 107A states that the subsequent acts do now not represent infringement:

• Any act of making, constructing, using, selling or importing a patented invention totally for makes use of reasonably associated with the improvement and submission of statistics required beneath any Indian regulation, or law of a country other than India, that regulates the manufacture, construction, use, sale or import of any product;

• The importation of patented merchandise by any person from someone who’s duly authorized with the aid of the patentee beneath the law to supply and promote or distribute the products.

Bolar provision allows manufacturers to begin the studies and improvement process in time to make sure that affordable equal frequent medicines may be brought to market at once upon the expiry of the product patent.

Parallel import provisions are furnished in section 107 A (b) of the Patents Act, which says that importation of patented products by using any character authorized via the Patentee will no longer be taken into consideration as an infringement. Therefore it’s miles feasible to import the patented products from the licensee of the patentee in any country without the permission of the Patentee. The cause of Parallel import is to check the abuse of patent rights and meant to govern the price of patented product.

We “Solubilis Corporate Services” are the registered Patent attorney, Company Secretary and Trademark Attorney in Chennai, Coimbatore, Bangalore, Hyderabad, Cochin, Salem, Madurai, Trichy, Tirupur and Karur. We have the group of well-skilled participants to do your Patent registration in Coimbatore, Chennai, Bangalore, Hyderabad, Cochin, Salem, Madurai, Trichy, Tirupur and Karur. For more details, kindly go through our website and call us. Our professionals are virtually one call away from you. Thanks for reading!!!

Leave a Reply